TURTLE ISLAND
Please note that this Notice that was delivered by Mr. Swinwood was one that is given to the Crown (both the Federal and Provincal) if one is intending to sue them. This is a procedural step that is taken pursuant legislation affecting proceedings against the Crown. The document is not issued by any Court and it does not represent a formal proceeding. It is merely notice by the lawyer for those individuals described in the document of the intention of commencing an action.... which may or may not happen. I will not comment on the possible "Class Proceeding" that is described within the notice except to point out that the author of the document proposes to seek to enjoin the Crowns from facilitating the ANR elections... which as anyone knows who practices in the area cannot be done - you don't enjoin the Crown.
I would like to point out that the ANTC
and Pikwàkanagàn are in agreement
to descent only with no blood quantum and cannot in anyway be held in
complicity to genocide in the application of the ARN election
process.
In my honest opinion,
the core group of these dissenting people are
hunters that believe they have aboriginal rights to harvest animals whenever
they choose, with no regard to conservation or Algonquin values. - Chief Patrick Glassford
![]()
SUPERIOR COURT OF ONTARIO
BETWEEN
Daniel
Lynden Sarazin, Robert W. Lavalley, Clayton Powers,
Randy Cota, Robert Whiteduck, Jane Chartrand, Heather
Majaury,
Allan Turcotte, Denis Vaillancourt, Victor Ross, Bob
Brunet,
Tom Brunnet, Grant Tusic, Ken Duff, Wayne Lance, Deb Kalaga,
Mike Suchy, Wileed Antoine, and other Algonquins of the
Algonquin
Nation of Ontario and Quebec (to be identified in a class
action)
Plaintiffs
AND
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
The Attorney General of Canada
The Attorney General of Ontario
The Chief and Band Council of
Pikwakanagan
The Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development
Federal Interlocutor for Metis and Non-Status Indians
A.N.T.C./ANND Corporation
Ministry of Natural Resources (Ontario)
NOTICE OF CLAIM
(pursuant to S. 7(1) of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27)
Please be advised that the Algonquin Nation of Ontario and Quebec, through the named representatives as Plaintiffs above and those to be added to the class, in an intended class action on the tort of genocide (more particularly outlined in Appendix AA@) arising out of the on-going consciousness of genocide displayed by all levels of government towards the Algonquin Nation, exemplified by the course of action adopted by the Ontario government and implicitly endorsed by the federal government and Her Majesty the Queen, in the meeting chaired by Robert Potts of Blaney McMurty on November 30, 2004 at the Best Western Inn, Bancroft, ON, between the hours of 7:00 and 10:00 p.m.
And this shall serve as the
intended Plaintiffs= Notice of Class
Action pursuant to Section 7(1)
of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, R.S.O. Chapter P. 27 by their
solicitors identified herein.
ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
DATED at Almonte, ON, this 7th day of December, 2004.
__________________________
Michael
Swinwood
Barrister & Solicitor
346 Waverley
Street
Ottawa, ON K2P
0W5
Telephone:
(613) 563-7474
Facsimile: (613)
563-9179
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs
APPENDIX AA@
A. Convention on the Prosecution and Punishment on the Crime of Genocide:9 December 1948 (Athe Convention@), General Assembly of the United Nations
Resolution 96(1) dated 11 December 1946 that genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world
Article 2
In the present Convention,
genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such
1) killing members of the group;
2) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about is physical destruction in whole or in part;
4) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
Article 3
The following acts shall be
punishable:
1) genocide;
2) conspiracy to commit genocide;
3) attempt to commit genocide;
4) attempt to commit genocide;
5)
complicity in genocide
Article 4
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.
B. Circumstances giving rise to the tort of genocide as against the members of the Algonquin Nation
As the crime of assault is a criminal matter and also actionable in the civil context, so is the crime of genocide actionable as the tort of genocide. The principles enunciated in the above United Nations Treaty on Genocide have all been violated by all levels of government in Canada, from the killing of Louis Riel and countless other native people, up to and including the killing of Dudley George at Ipperwash, Ontario, residential school abuses, sterilization of Indian women and the on-going infliction of mental harm on the Algonquin Nation in the present land claim conducted by the Province of Ontario and the Federal Government.
The wrongdoings which centre around
the violation of Article 2 (A) and (C) of
the Convention, which will be addressed by the Plaintiffs which include some
of the following:
1.
Chief and Band Council of Pikwakanagan are created by the Federal
Indian Act and are thus agents of the Federal Government and therefore cannot
represent members of the Algonquin Nation.
The mental harm inflicted on the members of the Algonquin Nation by
virtue of this apartheid like condition cannot continue and the government
imposed Algonquin Enrolment Law creates a favoured position for the Chief and
Band Council of Pikwakanagan.
2.
The imposition of an electoral process, contrary to the traditions and
customs of the Algonquin Nation, creating something called the Algonquin
Negotiation Representative, is inflicting conditions of life on the group
calculated to bring about its physical destruction, which naturally flow from
a conspiracy to limit the eventual land base and deprive the group of their
natural hunting and fishing territories upon which the group has depended
since time immemorial for its continued
growth and survival;
3.
By excluding members of the Algonquin Nation, composed of Algonquin
people form the Province of Ontario and Quebec, those involved in the present
land negotiation process in Ontario, become complicit in the long term
strategy of all levels of government to continue to divide and conquer all
native people in the territory known as Canada.
4.
By providing funds to Algonquin people who have no authority to act on
behalf of the Algonquin Nation, with no proper financial accountability to the
members of the Algonquin Nation thereby creating an atmosphere of severe
mental stress to the group requiring an immediate accounting for the use of
those funds.
C.
Circumstances relating to the Ministry of Natural Resources
1. By virtue of the relationship between the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, the Province of Ontario has offended its constitutional obligation to recognize and affirm Aboriginal rights, and has embarked on a course of action which denies and negates the Aboriginal rights of the Algonquin Nation in the Province of Ontario.
2.
The federal government is complicit in this failing of constitutional
obligation as set out in S. 35 (1) of the Constitution Act, by allowing the
chief and band council of Pikwakanagan to adopt an Algonquin Nation Law which
simply replicates elements of the Ministry of Natural Resources laws and
regulations, all designed to deny and negate Aboriginal rights in unceded
Algonquin territory, protected by the Proclamation of 1763,
D.
Relief which will be sought include, but is not limited to, the
following:
1. Declaration of sovereignty of the Algonquin Nation;
2.
Injunctive relief to enjoin further negotiations as presently structured
and outlined at
the November
30th, 2004 meeting;
3. 13 Billion dollars in damages;
4. Comprehensive land claims, including the traditional Algonquin territory;
5. Funding to pursue litigation; and
6. Costs of this action.
All of the issues identified above were enunciated in the meeting at Bancroft, Ontario on November 30th, 2004 and should serve as sufficient particulars to allow the Attorney General of Ontario to investigate this claim.
On behalf of my clients I am
prepared to provide any additional particulars that may be requested.
DATED at Almonte, Ontario this 7th day of December, 2004.
Michael
Swinwood
Barrister & Solicitor
346 Waverley
Street
Ottawa, ON K2P
0W5
Telephone: (613)
563-7474
Facsimile: (613)
563-9179
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs
![]()
Page created by: muckwa
Changes last made on:
January 13, 2005.
![]()